Posts

Time Management for Leaders: Why Most "Productivity Gurus" Are Missing the Point

Here's something that'll ruffle some feathers: the best manager I ever worked under never used a calendar app.

Bob Henderson ran a team of forty-seven people across three Melbourne warehouses in the early 2000s, and his entire time management system consisted of a battered notebook, a red pen, and what he called "aggressive delegation." While the rest of us were frantically downloading the latest productivity software (remember Palm Pilots?), Bob was somehow everywhere he needed to be, solving problems before they became fires, and still home for dinner with his family every night at 6 PM sharp.

The man was a bloody legend. And he taught me that most leadership time management advice is complete rubbish.

The Problem with Modern Time Management "Solutions"

Walk into any Officeworks and you'll find entire aisles dedicated to planners, apps, and systems promising to revolutionise your productivity. LinkedIn is absolutely drowning in posts about the "5 AM club" and "time-blocking techniques." Everyone's got an opinion about which digital tool will finally solve your scheduling nightmares.

But here's what nobody wants to admit: the problem isn't your system. The problem is that you're trying to manage time instead of managing energy and expectations.

I spent five years as a business consultant before starting my own training company, and I've watched hundreds of leaders burn themselves out trying to optimise their calendars. They'll colour-code their Google Calendar like a rainbow, set seventeen different notification alerts, and still end up working until 9 PM wondering where their day went.

The issue is deeper than that. It's cultural.

We've created this mythology around busy-ness in Australian business culture that's frankly toxic. You know the type – they wear their sixty-hour weeks like a badge of honour, constantly talking about how "flat out" they are. These people mistake motion for progress and confuse being reactive with being productive.

What Actually Works (And Why You Won't Like It)

Here's where I'm going to lose some of you: effective time management for leaders isn't about maximising every minute. It's about being strategically lazy.

Bob Henderson understood this instinctively. While other managers were micromanaging every detail, Bob focused on three things: hiring people smarter than him, giving them clear outcomes (not processes), and then getting out of their way. His notebook contained maybe twenty items at any given time. That's it.

The rest of us? We had task lists longer than a Bunnings receipt.

I learned this lesson the hard way during my consulting days. There was this particularly memorable week where I had 47 items on my to-do list. Forty-seven! I was using some complicated app that promised to "gamify productivity" – remember when everything was being gamified? I felt like I was playing Tetris with my life, trying to fit every possible task into perfectly optimised time blocks.

By Thursday afternoon, I was having what can only be described as a mild breakdown in the car park of a Westfield in Parramatta. That's when I realised something crucial: most of what we think is urgent is actually just noise.

The time management training courses that actually work focus on this principle. They teach you to distinguish between what feels urgent and what's actually important. But here's the kicker – this distinction is different for every leader, in every industry, at every stage of their career.

The Three Pillars of Leader Time Management (That No One Talks About)

1. Energy Management Over Time Management

Your energy levels fluctuate throughout the day. This isn't news. But most leaders ignore this biological reality and try to tackle their hardest decisions when they're running on fumes.

I'm a morning person. Always have been. My brain works best between 6 AM and 10 AM. So guess when I schedule my most important meetings? That's right – first thing in the morning. Controversial opinion: if you're making big decisions at 4 PM on a Friday, you're doing it wrong.

Some of my colleagues think I'm mad for blocking out my mornings for strategic work. "But that's when everyone wants to meet!" they say. Exactly my point. When everyone else is reactive, that's when you should be proactive.

2. Delegation as a Leadership Skill, Not a Time Management Hack

Here's something that'll upset the control freaks: if you can't delegate effectively, you'll never manage your time well as a leader. Full stop.

I see this constantly in emotional intelligence training for managers sessions. Leaders intellectually understand delegation but emotionally resist it. They're terrified that if they're not personally involved in every decision, something will go wrong.

News flash: something will go wrong anyway. The question is whether you want to be micromanaging the small stuff when the big problems hit.

The best delegators I know don't just hand off tasks – they transfer ownership. There's a massive difference. When you delegate a task, you're still responsible for the outcome. When you transfer ownership, someone else becomes accountable for both the process and the result.

Bob Henderson was brilliant at this. He'd say something like, "Sarah, the warehouse efficiency numbers need to improve by 15% over the next quarter. I don't care how you do it, but keep me posted on your progress every Friday." Then he'd walk away and let Sarah figure it out.

Did Sarah sometimes make mistakes? Absolutely. But she also came up with solutions Bob never would have thought of. And more importantly, Bob wasn't spending his time managing warehouse efficiency – he was focused on bigger picture stuff like client relationships and strategic planning.

3. The Power of Saying No (Diplomatically)

This is where most Australian leaders struggle. We're culturally conditioned to be helpful, to pitch in, to say yes when someone asks for our time. It's killing our effectiveness.

I had a client a few years back – let's call him Dave – who was the general manager of a mid-sized construction company in Brisbane. Dave was universally loved by his team. Great bloke, always willing to help, never said no to a request. He was also working sixteen-hour days and his marriage was falling apart.

The problem wasn't that Dave was bad at time management. The problem was that Dave had never learned to protect his time strategically.

We worked together for six months, and the biggest breakthrough came when Dave started asking one simple question before agreeing to any request: "If I say yes to this, what am I saying no to?"

Suddenly, Dave started seeing the real cost of his yes-habit. Every meeting he agreed to was time he couldn't spend on strategic planning. Every "quick favour" was energy he couldn't invest in his key priorities.

Within three months, Dave had cut his working hours by 30% and his team's performance had actually improved. Why? Because instead of being available for every minor decision, Dave was focused on the high-impact activities that only he could do.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Leadership Time Management

Here's what the productivity gurus don't want you to know: good time management often looks like you're doing less, not more.

I was reminded of this recently during a managing difficult conversations training session I was running for a mining company in Perth. One of the participants – a department head with about fifteen direct reports – was frustrated because his calendar was constantly full but he felt like he wasn't achieving anything meaningful.

During the break, I asked him to show me his typical week. It was wall-to-wall meetings. Status updates, progress reviews, team catch-ups, project check-ins. All important stuff, theoretically. But when I asked him what decisions he'd made that week that only he could make, he couldn't come up with a single example.

This guy was working sixty hours a week and adding almost no unique value. His entire day was consumed by activities that his team members could handle themselves if they were properly trained and empowered.

That's the dirty secret of leadership time management: if you're busy all the time, you're probably not doing your job properly.

What This Looks Like in Practice

Let me paint you a picture of what effective leadership time management actually looks like, because it's not what you'd expect.

Sarah Chen runs operations for a logistics company based in Sydney. She manages about thirty people across four different sites. Her calendar looks almost empty compared to her peers – maybe three or four meetings per day, with large blocks of unscheduled time.

But here's what's happening during those "empty" hours: Sarah is thinking strategically, solving complex problems, and making decisions that save her company hundreds of thousands of dollars. She's not putting out fires because she's created systems that prevent fires from starting.

When Sarah does meet with her team, those meetings are focused and decisive. No status updates, no rambling discussions. Specific problems, clear outcomes, defined next steps. Done.

The result? Sarah's division consistently outperforms the others, her team has the highest engagement scores in the company, and Sarah herself works maybe fifty hours a week – reasonable for a senior leader.

Her secret isn't some revolutionary time management system. It's that she understands the difference between being busy and being effective.

The Role of Technology (And Why It's Overrated)

Now, I'm not completely anti-technology. I use digital calendars, project management tools, all that stuff. But I've noticed something interesting: the leaders who are most effective with technology are also the ones who could probably manage just fine without it.

They use technology to support their systems, not to create their systems.

Remember Bob Henderson with his notebook? In today's world, Bob might use a smartphone and cloud-based calendar. But his fundamental approach wouldn't change: focus on outcomes, delegate ownership, protect strategic thinking time.

The problem comes when people think the technology is the solution. They download the latest app, spend hours setting it up, then wonder why their productivity hasn't improved. It's like buying expensive golf clubs and expecting to immediately play like a professional.

I've seen this pattern repeat dozens of times during team development training sessions. Someone will ask about the "best" project management software, or which calendar app I recommend. My answer is always the same: it doesn't matter. The tool is irrelevant if you don't understand the principles.

Common Mistakes That Even Good Leaders Make

Mistake #1: Confusing Urgent with Important

Stephen Covey wrote about this decades ago, but leaders are still getting it wrong. Just because someone needs an answer "urgently" doesn't mean the question is important to your strategic objectives.

I worked with a CEO recently who was spending two hours every day responding to "urgent" emails that could have been handled by his executive assistant or department heads. Two hours! That's time he could have spent on business development, strategic planning, or relationship building with key clients.

Mistake #2: Underestimating Transition Time

Here's something nobody talks about: switching between different types of activities has a cognitive cost. You can't go straight from a budget review meeting to a creative brainstorming session and expect your brain to operate at full capacity.

Good leaders build buffer time into their schedules. Not just for when meetings run over (although they always do), but to mentally transition between different modes of thinking.

Mistake #3: Scheduling Back-to-Back Meetings

This one drives me mental. You'll see calendars where someone has literally scheduled meetings from 8 AM to 6 PM with no breaks. Not even time to grab a coffee or visit the loo.

This isn't productivity – it's a recipe for poor decision-making and burnout.

The Real Secret: It's About Energy, Not Time

Here's the thing that took me years to understand: you can't actually manage time. Time is fixed. What you can manage is your energy and attention.

Every leader has a limited amount of decision-making capacity each day. Every choice you make, every problem you solve, every interruption you handle depletes that capacity slightly. By the end of the day, even simple decisions become difficult.

This is why effective leaders are obsessive about protecting their peak energy hours for their most important work.

Practical Steps You Can Implement This Week

Alright, enough theory. Here's what you can actually do:

Start with an energy audit. For one week, track not just what you do, but how you feel while you're doing it. When are you most alert? When do you feel mentally tired? When are you just going through the motions?

Identify your unique value. What decisions can only you make? What problems can only you solve? Everything else should be delegated or eliminated.

Protect your peak hours. Whatever time of day you're most sharp, block it out for strategic work. Don't schedule routine meetings during this time.

Batch similar activities. Instead of checking email throughout the day, designate specific times for email. Same with phone calls, administrative tasks, and routine meetings.

Build in thinking time. This sounds obvious, but most leaders never schedule time to just think. Your calendar should include regular blocks for strategic thinking, problem-solving, and planning.

The irony is that by doing less, you'll achieve more. By being more selective about how you spend your time, you'll have greater impact on your organisation.

And if you're one of those leaders who thinks this approach won't work in your industry or with your responsibilities, I'd challenge you to try it for just one month. Track your results. See what happens when you focus on being effective rather than just being busy.

You might be surprised by what you discover.

Looking to develop better leadership habits in your team? Check out our range of professional development programs designed specifically for Australian businesses.